<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WageLaw on Brinker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/wagelaw-on-brinker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/wagelaw-on-brinker/</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Original reporting. Cradle-to-grave law tracking. Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:42:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLSE Updates Manual To Reflect Brinker (huh?) &#124; Storm's California Employment Law</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/wagelaw-on-brinker/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>DLSE Updates Manual To Reflect Brinker (huh?) &#124; Storm's California Employment Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/wagelaw-on-brinker/#comment-940</guid>
		<description>[...] course, the DLSE wanted the first Brinker opinion published, even though it disagreed with existing DLSE policy.  The DIR did not reply to questions at the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, the DLSE wanted the first Brinker opinion published, even though it disagreed with existing DLSE policy.  The DIR did not reply to questions at the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
