<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storm&#039;s Employment Law &#187; torrey pines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/tag/torrey-pines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 15:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jones v. The Lodge at Torrey Pines</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/jones-v-the-lodge-at-torrey-pines/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/jones-v-the-lodge-at-torrey-pines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrey pines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/jones-v-the-lodge-at-torrey-pines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[4-3, goes parallel with Reno v. Baird.  I never really understood (a) what good making employees personally liable for harassment or retaliation would do, and (b) why retaliation should be treated any differently than harassment.  Non-employers simply aren&#8217;t in a &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/jones-v-the-lodge-at-torrey-pines/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/jones-v-the-lodge-at-torrey-pines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BREAKING:  Jones v. Lodge at Torrey Pines Opinion Forthcoming</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/breaking-jones-v-lodge-at-torrey-pines-opinion-forthcoming/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/breaking-jones-v-lodge-at-torrey-pines-opinion-forthcoming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrey pines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/breaking-jones-v-lodge-at-torrey-pines-opinion-forthcoming/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This case decides whether an individual be held personally liable for retaliation under the FEHA.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/breaking-jones-v-lodge-at-torrey-pines-opinion-forthcoming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jones v. Torrey Pines Oral Argument Report</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/jones-v-torrey-pines-oral-argument-report/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/jones-v-torrey-pines-oral-argument-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrey pines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/jones-v-torrey-pines-oral-argument-report/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With my thanks to an observer at the oral argument who wishes to remain anonymous: Overall, I recall the defense focused on the implication for having supervisors personally liable (i.e., if supervisors are just following order from the top).  The &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/jones-v-torrey-pines-oral-argument-report/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/jones-v-torrey-pines-oral-argument-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast for the week of 12/3/2007 [Late]</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-1232007-late/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-1232007-late/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrey pines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-1232007-late/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week I discuss Torrey Pines and judicial economy. [display_podcast] Happy Hanukkah.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-1232007-late/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Podcast This Week; In Brief</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/no-podcast-this-week-in-brief/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/no-podcast-this-week-in-brief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrey pines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/no-podcast-this-week-in-brief/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to the slow week last week, I don&#8217;t have enough worthwhile to say to create a Podcast. We&#8217;ll be back next week with a new Podcast. Briefly noted: DHS retracts no-match letters in wake of court&#8217;s ruling. Torrey Pines &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/no-podcast-this-week-in-brief/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/no-podcast-this-week-in-brief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast for the week of 11/19/2007</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gattuso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genomic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrey pines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Genomic discrimination, Torrey Pines, and more on Gattuso. [display_podcast]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

