<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storm&#039;s Employment Law &#187; SB 622</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/tag/sb-622/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 15:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SB 622 Follow-Up</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-follow-up/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-follow-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 622]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-follow-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I apologize for having nothing further on SB 622.  Senator Padilla&#8217;s office, who is usually very quick to get back to me, has not returned my calls asking for comment on the veto of SB 622. I&#8217;m going to go &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-follow-up/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-follow-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SB 622 Vetoed</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-vetoed/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-vetoed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 622]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More to come&#8230;. To the Members of the California State Senate: I am returning Senate Bill 622 without my signature. Although this bill is intended to promote the worthy goal of ensuring employees are not intentionally misclassified as independent contractors, &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-vetoed/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-vetoed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast for the week of 10/1/2007</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-1012007/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-1012007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 622]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Independent contractor misclassification becomes a bigger and bigger trend. [display_podcast]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-1012007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Estrada v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/estrada-v-fedex-ground-package-system-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/estrada-v-fedex-ground-package-system-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estrada v. Fedex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 622]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you wonder why I obsess over S.B. 622—which stands little chance of becoming law—it&#8217;s because I believe it is part of a trend of increasing enforcement of the independent contractor/employee distinction.  Shaw Valenza has a good rundown of the &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/estrada-v-fedex-ground-package-system-inc/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/estrada-v-fedex-ground-package-system-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Chamber of Commerce&#039;s Veto Wishlist</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/california-chamber-of-commerces-veto-wishlist/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/california-chamber-of-commerces-veto-wishlist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 622]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It includes SB 622. None of the others that I am tracking are listed. Based on the Legislative Calendar, I believe the Governor has until October 14 to veto or sign the bills that were presented at the end of &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/california-chamber-of-commerces-veto-wishlist/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/california-chamber-of-commerces-veto-wishlist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast for the week of 9/17/2007</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-9172007/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-9172007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 05:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brinker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 622]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New developments on the end of the Legislature&#8217;s session. I completed my interviews for this early, and I will be in Sacramento on business next week, so I wanted to be sure to get this up ASAP. Enjoy. [display_podcast]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-9172007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast for the week of 9/10/2007</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-9102007/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-9102007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEO Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 622]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[display_podcast] The Legislature&#8217;s end-of-session flurry.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-9102007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SB 622 To Governor</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-to-governor/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-to-governor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 622]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate concurred in the Assembly amendments by a vote of 22-16 this morning.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-to-governor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SB 622 Amended To Drop Private Right of Action.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-amended-to-drop-private-right-of-action/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-amended-to-drop-private-right-of-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 23:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 622]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SB 622, which I felt would have been the one potentially paradigm-shifting piece of employment law legislation this session, has been significantly amended. The new version of the bill drops the private right of action for independent contractor misclassification. A &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-amended-to-drop-private-right-of-action/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-amended-to-drop-private-right-of-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

