<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storm&#039;s Employment Law &#187; Murphy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/tag/murphy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 15:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Employment-related Bills 2008</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employment-related-bills-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employment-related-bills-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ragingwire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SB 674 (Dutton) &#8211; Incentives for employers who provide health care and other benefits. SB 737 (Caleron) &#8211; Legislature&#8217;s intent to clarify meal and rest period law. SB 940 (Yee) &#8211; Temporoary employees must be paid more frequently. SB 953 &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employment-related-bills-2008/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employment-related-bills-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislative Response to Murphy v. Kenneth Cole?</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislative-response-to-murphy-v-kenneth-cole/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislative-response-to-murphy-v-kenneth-cole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage/hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my rundown of the bills pending before the legislature related to employment, I came across SB 737. I am going to find out more in the coming days, but I just thought I&#8217;d post this in light on Monday&#8217;s &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislative-response-to-murphy-v-kenneth-cole/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislative-response-to-murphy-v-kenneth-cole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

