<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storm&#039;s Employment Law &#187; Legislature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/tag/legislature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:02:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>If you say so…</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/if-you-say-so%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/if-you-say-so%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MoFo says [pdf]: The 2009 legislative sessions in both Sacramento and Washington, D.C. have yielded significant developments for labor and employment law. Both? I would say, on the contrary, the 2009 legislative session in Sacramento was probably the least eventful &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/if-you-say-so%e2%80%a6/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/if-you-say-so%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terminated.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/terminated/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/terminated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 335]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 527]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last two bills we were tracking were vetoed today.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/terminated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End of session update</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/end-of-session-update/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/end-of-session-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AB 335 is awaiting action by the governor. AB 527 is awaiting action by the governor. The rest are dead for this year, and the Governor is saying he&#8217;s going to veto everything anyway. My guess is that we won&#8217;t &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/end-of-session-update/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/end-of-session-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislature Hasn&#039;t Moved Employment-related Bills.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislature-hasnt-moved-employment-related-bills/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislature-hasnt-moved-employment-related-bills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shocker, I know. No movement in the last little while on any bills that I&#8217;m tracking for changes to California employment law. Most of them are alive in name only.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislature-hasnt-moved-employment-related-bills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislative Update</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislative-update-4/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislative-update-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 22:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ab1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ab1001]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ab335]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ab527]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ab842]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Legislature has, understandably, been spending a lot of time rejecting almost every spending bill. Details here in the Bee. SB 810 (universal healthcare) was shot down as well. Employers will still be stuck administering health plans. AB 227 appears &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislative-update-4/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislative-update-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Employment-related Bills</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/2009-employment-related-bills/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/2009-employment-related-bills/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is a selection of bills in the California related to employment law. It is not an exhaustive list. Links to bills I am tracking are included. Those links will break in 2010 and I may or may not &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/2009-employment-related-bills/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/2009-employment-related-bills/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employment Bills 2009</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employment-bills-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employment-bills-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Budget passed. Back to regular work? We&#8217;ll see. Here are some employment-related bills. (Look for updates, this is a preliminary list.) AB 141 &#8211; Individual alternative work weeks. AB 227 &#8211; Would add an advice hotline at the DIR and &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employment-bills-2009/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employment-bills-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/budget/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/budget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/budget/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been dedicating the time I usually spend on blogging following the budget mess. Since no other legislation is gonna move until this is done, it&#8217;s not like I&#8217;m missing anything.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislative Wrap-Up</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislative-wrap-up/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislative-wrap-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[None of the bills we were tracking were signed into law, except SB 940. (See my original list, here.) Of the bills opposed by the California Chamber of Commerce, only AB 2075 was signed into law. For that reason, we&#8217;ll take an in &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislative-wrap-up/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/legislative-wrap-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steinberg, former labor lawyer, elected president pro tem of state senate</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/steinberg-former-labor-lawyer-elected-president-pro-tem-of-state-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/steinberg-former-labor-lawyer-elected-president-pro-tem-of-state-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Sacramento Bee: Six months after the decision was made, Darrell Steinberg – a former labor lawyer and unabashed liberal – was formally elected Senate president pro tem Thursday in a unanimous voice vote by his colleagues. Steinberg is &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/steinberg-former-labor-lawyer-elected-president-pro-tem-of-state-senate/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/steinberg-former-labor-lawyer-elected-president-pro-tem-of-state-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

