<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storm&#039;s Employment Law &#187; labor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/tag/labor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 15:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EFCA Wars.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/efca-wars/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/efca-wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To borrow from what will surely be Condoleeza Rice&#8217;s entry in Bartlett&#8217;s: &#8220;I don&#8217;t think anyone could have predicted&#8221; that there would be a compromise on EFCA! (Of course she was saying that without any sense of irony nine months &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/efca-wars/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/efca-wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>60 In The Senate.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/60-in-the-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/60-in-the-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Jottings: It will be interesting indeed if they can get Specter on board. The article headline is of course a reference to the 60 votes that it takes to break a filibuster in the Senate. My current thought, some &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/60-in-the-senate/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/60-in-the-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Management Bar:</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/dear-management-bar/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/dear-management-bar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You do realize that the Employee Free Choice Act will mean more work for you, right? I&#8217;m impressed by the apparent selflessness shown by so many firms in opposing that law. Maybe you represent those clients in so many areas &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/dear-management-bar/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/dear-management-bar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

