<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storm&#039;s Employment Law &#187; independent contractor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/tag/independent-contractor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 15:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Waxman After Blackwater for Independent Contract Misclassification</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/waxman-after-blackwater-for-independent-contract-misclassification/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/waxman-after-blackwater-for-independent-contract-misclassification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent contractor misclassification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/waxman-after-blackwater-for-independent-contract-misclassification/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the AP: &#8220;By classifying its armed guards and other personnel as independent contractors instead of employees, Blackwater has apparently evaded withholding and paying these taxes,&#8221; Waxman, D-Calif., wrote in a letter to Blackwater chief Erik Prince. You can read &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/waxman-after-blackwater-for-independent-contract-misclassification/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/waxman-after-blackwater-for-independent-contract-misclassification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SB 622 Follow-Up</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-follow-up/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-follow-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 622]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-follow-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I apologize for having nothing further on SB 622.  Senator Padilla&#8217;s office, who is usually very quick to get back to me, has not returned my calls asking for comment on the veto of SB 622. I&#8217;m going to go &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-follow-up/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sb-622-follow-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast for the week of 10/1/2007</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-1012007/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-1012007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 622]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Independent contractor misclassification becomes a bigger and bigger trend. [display_podcast]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-1012007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Estrada v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/estrada-v-fedex-ground-package-system-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/estrada-v-fedex-ground-package-system-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estrada v. Fedex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 622]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you wonder why I obsess over S.B. 622—which stands little chance of becoming law—it&#8217;s because I believe it is part of a trend of increasing enforcement of the independent contractor/employee distinction.  Shaw Valenza has a good rundown of the &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/estrada-v-fedex-ground-package-system-inc/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/estrada-v-fedex-ground-package-system-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

