<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storm&#039;s Employment Law &#187; Hillsides</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/tag/hillsides/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:34:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hernandez v. Hillsides</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hernandez-v-hillside/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hernandez-v-hillside/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillsides]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At long last, we have an opinion from the California Supreme Court. My analysis will be forthcoming shortly. UPDATE: The Court correctly identifies the distinguishing factor that made Saunders such a useless precedent: the &#8220;invader&#8221; in that case was not &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hernandez-v-hillside/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hernandez-v-hillside/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

