<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storm&#039;s Employment Law &#187; hillside</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/tag/hillside/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 15:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LA Times on Hillside</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/la-times-on-hillside/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/la-times-on-hillside/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillside]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over two years after the Supreme Court granted review, it heard oral arguments in the first significant private employer workplace privacy case* to come before it. The L.A. Times&#8216;s report is here. This is the analysis: The justices&#8217; queries and &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/la-times-on-hillside/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/la-times-on-hillside/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillside Resurrected</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hillside-ressurected/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hillside-ressurected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillside]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After almost two years without any activity, Hillside v. Hernandez, which deals with issues of workplace privacy issues for private employers, is back on calendar. Oral argument will be head in the California Supreme court on June 3, 2009.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hillside-ressurected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee Privacy In The Workplace: Hernandez v. Hillside and Ziegler</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employee-privacy-in-the-workplace-hernandez-and-ziegler/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employee-privacy-in-the-workplace-hernandez-and-ziegler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillside]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, the Court of Appeal handed down an opinion in the relatively undeveloped area of non-public employee privacy rights vis-a-vis their employer, in Hillside v. Hernandez. That case held that a hidden camera in the workplace could constitute an &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employee-privacy-in-the-workplace-hernandez-and-ziegler/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employee-privacy-in-the-workplace-hernandez-and-ziegler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hernandez v. Hillside Depublished</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hernandez-v-hillside-depublished/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hernandez-v-hillside-depublished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEO Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillside]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The poorly decided case of Hernandez v. Hillside has been depublished. I rarely express strong opinions on case law like this. Often, I don&#8217;t understand all of the details to really speak with the level of authority I feel is &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hernandez-v-hillside-depublished/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hernandez-v-hillside-depublished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hernandez v. Hillside, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hernandez-v-hillside-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hernandez-v-hillside-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 23:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hillside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hat tip to Sheppard Mullin. You can read their more detailed analysis. I would just add that the technical holding in the Saunders case cited by the Hernandez court is not As a matter of law, a claim of intrusion &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hernandez-v-hillside-inc/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hernandez-v-hillside-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

