<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storm&#039;s Employment Law &#187; gattuso</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/tag/gattuso/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 15:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast for the week of 11/19/2007</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gattuso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genomic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrey pines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Genomic discrimination, Torrey Pines, and more on Gattuso. [display_podcast]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on Gattuso</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/more-on-gattuso/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/more-on-gattuso/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gattuso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage/hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/more-on-gattuso/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve now had a chance to more fully digest the Gattuso opinion. The issue that it resolves is actually rather narrow, and of little utility in either enforcing employee rights or giving compliance guidance to employers. It&#8217;s almost useless.The advance-sheet &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/more-on-gattuso/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/more-on-gattuso/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gattuso v. Harte-Hanks Shoppers, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/gattuso-v-harte-hanks-shoppers-inc-2/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/gattuso-v-harte-hanks-shoppers-inc-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2802]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gattuso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage/hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/gattuso-v-harte-hanks-shoppers-inc-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a pro-employer decision allowing for Labor Code section 2802 reimbursements to be made by base salary or compensation increases, provided there is a method to the apportionment. More to come. . . (We&#8217;re busy today!) You can read &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/gattuso-v-harte-hanks-shoppers-inc-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/gattuso-v-harte-hanks-shoppers-inc-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Podcast for the week of 11/5/2007</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-1152007/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-1152007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brinker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gattuso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gentry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-1152007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a few notes about the past week.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-1152007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

