<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storm&#039;s Employment Law &#187; Federal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/tag/federal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 15:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Independent Contractor Misclassifications Go Federal</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/independent-contractor-misclassifications-go-federal/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/independent-contractor-misclassifications-go-federal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 20:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent contractor misclassification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent contrtactor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S 2004]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senators Durbin (D-IL) and Obama (D-IL) announced in a recent Chicago Sun-Times op-ed that they have introduced the Independent Contractor Proper Classification Act of 2007 (S. 2004). Their op-ed cites a study that claims that hundreds of millions of dollars &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/independent-contractor-misclassifications-go-federal/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/independent-contractor-misclassifications-go-federal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roberts</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/roberts/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/roberts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor/NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nathan Newman has a first look a t Judge Roberts&#8217;s labor law record here. (Warning: non-objective commentary follows). Roberts will get through comfortably, I&#8217;d bet on it.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/roberts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Head v. Glacier Northwest, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/head-v-glacier-northwest-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/head-v-glacier-northwest-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEO Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Head v. Glacier Northwest, Inc. (9th Cir. Case No. 03-035567) In employment discrimination action under Americans with Disabilities Act, plaintiff’s own testimony, unsupported by medical or comparative evidence, may suffice to establish triable issue of fact as to whether plaintiff’s &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/head-v-glacier-northwest-inc/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/head-v-glacier-northwest-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coghlan v. American Seafoods Co.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/coghlan-v-american-seafoods-co/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/coghlan-v-american-seafoods-co/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEO Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to preface this case note by saying that I am Norwegian and we don&#8217;t fire people for not being Norwegian, we fire them for being Swedes! (= Coghlan v. American Seafoods (9th Cir. Case No. 03-35314) The &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/coghlan-v-american-seafoods-co/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/coghlan-v-american-seafoods-co/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Make Over on Makeup case?</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/make-over-on-makeup-case/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/make-over-on-makeup-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEO Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t usually blog federal cases, but I found it interesting that the Ninth Circuit agreed to rehear en banc the Harrah&#8217;s case. The Bakersfield Californian has more.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/make-over-on-makeup-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New rules on hiring undocumented workers?</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/new-rules-on-hiring-undocumented-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/new-rules-on-hiring-undocumented-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The San Diego Union Tribune reports on a new proposal in Congress to punish employers who hire illegal immigrants. The penalties may be up to 5 years and $50,000.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/new-rules-on-hiring-undocumented-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TA strike at Cal State</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/ta-strike-at-cal-state/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/ta-strike-at-cal-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 18:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor/NLRB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Academic student employees at the 23 California State University campuses will stage a one-day strike today over unresolved labor issues. The Chronicle reports. The NLRB&#8217;s recent ruling in NYU. does not apply to state employees.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/ta-strike-at-cal-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#039;s not exactly the GI bill but &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/its-not-exactly-the-gi-bill-but/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/its-not-exactly-the-gi-bill-but/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bush administration proposed new regulations Monday aimed at clarifying employment protections for veterans and reservists returning from active duty. The Labor Department initiative was announced as Democrat John Kerry stepped up his criticism of President Bush on Iraq. The &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/its-not-exactly-the-gi-bill-but/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/its-not-exactly-the-gi-bill-but/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Card checks.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/card-checks/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/card-checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor/NLRB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=69</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NLRB may rule ahead of the election on card-check certifications. The LA Times reports.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/card-checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Post Labor Day News Wrap</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/post-labor-day-news-wrap/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/post-labor-day-news-wrap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2004 15:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEO Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor/NLRB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage/hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Norcal grocery negotiations are ongoing, looking to avoid Socal situation. The San Jose Mercury News reports. The San Diego Union-Tribune reports on the on-going problem of workers returning from Iraq to find their jobs gone. The rest of the country &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/post-labor-day-news-wrap/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/post-labor-day-news-wrap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

