<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storm&#039;s Employment Law &#187; EFCA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/tag/efca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:02:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Let me make this crystal clear.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/let-me-make-this-crystal-clear/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/let-me-make-this-crystal-clear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 22:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFCA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lanny J. Davis, an attorney with the Washington D.C. office of the global law firm Orrick, Herrington &#38; Sutcliffe, pointed out that, contrary to assertions made by supporters of EFCA, the card-check bill would, in fact, permit the exclusion of &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/let-me-make-this-crystal-clear/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/let-me-make-this-crystal-clear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EFCA Wars.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/efca-wars/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/efca-wars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To borrow from what will surely be Condoleeza Rice&#8217;s entry in Bartlett&#8217;s: &#8220;I don&#8217;t think anyone could have predicted&#8221; that there would be a compromise on EFCA! (Of course she was saying that without any sense of irony nine months &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/efca-wars/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/efca-wars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hirsch and Epstein on EFCA</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hirsch-and-epstein-on-efca/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hirsch-and-epstein-on-efca/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFCA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff Hirsch replies to Richard Epstein&#8217;s column suggesting that the EFCA is unconstitutional under a free speech and takings analysis:  The argument isn&#8217;t developed much more than that and doesn&#8217;t seem particular strong to me.  I also have a hard &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hirsch-and-epstein-on-efca/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/hirsch-and-epstein-on-efca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>60 In The Senate.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/60-in-the-senate/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/60-in-the-senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Jottings: It will be interesting indeed if they can get Specter on board. The article headline is of course a reference to the 60 votes that it takes to break a filibuster in the Senate. My current thought, some &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/60-in-the-senate/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/60-in-the-senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More of EFCA…</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/more-of-efca%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/more-of-efca%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFCA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Spring had this commentary on the impact of the election on the EFCA. I disagree with his analysis in the following regards: Spring questions whether &#8220;newly elected Senators from traditional Republican states&#8221; would support it. Who, exactly, are those? &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/more-of-efca%e2%80%a6/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/more-of-efca%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee Free Choice Act.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employee-free-choice-act-2/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employee-free-choice-act-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFCA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I expect it to be passed in the first 100 days of the Obama administration. The question is: are you ready?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/employee-free-choice-act-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

