<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sac Bee on Ragingwire [Update: Oral Arguments]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sac-bee-on-ragingwire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sac-bee-on-ragingwire/</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Original reporting. Cradle-to-grave law tracking. Since 2004.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Peters</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sac-bee-on-ragingwire/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>James Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/sac-bee-on-ragingwire/#comment-354</guid>
		<description>I &lt;a href="http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/11/07/california-supreme-court-hears-arguments-on-employees-medical-marijuana-use/" rel="nofollow"&gt; agree that this case is a toss-up&lt;/a&gt;.  I call it 3-3 without Justice Corrigan, so who knows?

Like you, I really thought this would be upheld back when the appellate court's opinion was issued, but after oral argument I can see it going either way...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <a href="http://www.calemployeerightsblog.com/2007/11/07/california-supreme-court-hears-arguments-on-employees-medical-marijuana-use/" rel="nofollow"> agree that this case is a toss-up</a>.  I call it 3-3 without Justice Corrigan, so who knows?</p>
<p>Like you, I really thought this would be upheld back when the appellate court&#8217;s opinion was issued, but after oral argument I can see it going either way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
