<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ross v. Ragingwire Telecommunications, Inc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/ross-v-ragingwire-telecommunications-inc-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/ross-v-ragingwire-telecommunications-inc-2/</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Original reporting. Cradle-to-grave law tracking. Since 2004.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kent</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/ross-v-ragingwire-telecommunications-inc-2/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=198#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Compare: Oregon employers may be required to accommodate a "midnight toker"; per Washburn v. Columbia Forest Products (2005) at
&lt;a href="http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A116664.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A116664.htm&lt;/a&gt; online.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compare: Oregon employers may be required to accommodate a &#8220;midnight toker&#8221;; per Washburn v. Columbia Forest Products (2005) at<br />
<a href="http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A116664.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/A116664.htm</a> online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
