Comments on: Podcast for the week of 11/19/2007 http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/ The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Since 2004. Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:42:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jon-Erik G. Storm http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/#comment-62 Jon-Erik G. Storm Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:05:35 +0000 http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/#comment-62 The federal legislation prevents more than testing; it creates a new protected class. The federal legislation prevents more than testing; it creates a new protected class.

]]> By: Links for the week of 11/19/2007-11/21/2007 | Storm's California Employment Law http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/#comment-61 Links for the week of 11/19/2007-11/21/2007 | Storm's California Employment Law Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:37:16 +0000 http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/#comment-61 [...] Also, don’t forget this week’s podcast. [...] [...] Also, don’t forget this week’s podcast. [...]

]]> By: kent http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/#comment-60 kent Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:31:36 +0000 http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/podcast-for-the-week-of-11192007/#comment-60 currently, California's FEHA, at Gov Code 12940(o), makes unlawful: "(o) For an employer or other entity covered by this part, to subject, directly or indirectly, any employee, applicant, or other person to a test for the presence of a genetic characteristic." I don't know if the federal legislation is similar in focusing on the prohibition on testing.... currently, California’s FEHA, at Gov Code 12940(o), makes unlawful:
“(o) For an employer or other entity covered by this part, to
subject, directly or indirectly, any employee, applicant, or other
person to a test for the presence of a genetic characteristic.”

I don’t know if the federal legislation is similar in focusing on the prohibition on testing….

]]>