<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/murphy-v-kenneth-cole-productions-inc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/murphy-v-kenneth-cole-productions-inc/</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Original reporting. Cradle-to-grave law tracking. Since 2004.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: michael walsh</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/murphy-v-kenneth-cole-productions-inc/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>michael walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=201#comment-13</guid>
		<description>This case is likely to be petitioned to the California Supreme Court within the next few days. The case presents good issues for Supreme Court review, but the lack of disagreement among appellate courts (especially if you include the Riverside tentative ruling in Orco Block) might cause the Supremes to pass on the issue. As predominantly employee side lawyer, of course, I want to see the case reviewed.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This case is likely to be petitioned to the California Supreme Court within the next few days. The case presents good issues for Supreme Court review, but the lack of disagreement among appellate courts (especially if you include the Riverside tentative ruling in Orco Block) might cause the Supremes to pass on the issue. As predominantly employee side lawyer, of course, I want to see the case reviewed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
