Metters v. Ralphs: More Arbitroskepticism In California Courts

by Jon-Erik G. Storm on Wednesday, April 2nd, 2008

In Metters v. Ralphs Grocery Co (4th Dist. No. G038380) the Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s finding that no valid arbitration agreement was entered into by an employee who was told he had to agree to an arbitration in order to get Ralphs to investigate.

Share it:

Hide Sites

Tagged as: arbitration, feha

The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law.
Archives
Tweets
- http://ow.ly/1TMLJ iPhoneWarrantGate inspections begin. My thoughts at the link. 2010/06/03
- .@reckless Because it depends on the magnitude of the error. Plus, the contract may have opt/buy out dates in it. 2010/05/13
- Thoughts on job market realignment. http://ow.ly/1KsBc 2010/05/13
- .@reckless lawyers were right or (b) be just wrong. It was a brief, not a discovery response or testimony under oath. 2010/05/11
- .@reckless Good article, though I don't think it seals the deal on the term of the exclusivity. Apple's firm may (a) assumed the other... 2010/05/11
- Your business may still qualify for tax credits under the bill, even if you have more than 25 employees and even if... http://bit.ly/ayrVc2 2010/03/23
- A conjecture about the effect of the health care reform bill on the labor market. http://bit.ly/aj2md5 2010/03/20
- On strategy. http://bit.ly/b5N63J 2010/03/07
- http://bit.ly/crO3yX 2010/03/01
- Does your employee handbook read like stereo instructions written in legalese? I can get your manual compliant in... http://bit.ly/cVjVmw 2010/02/26

Metters v. Ralphs: More Arbitroskepticism In California Courts

Archives

Tweets

Bill & Case Status

From around the employment blogosphere