<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links for the week of April 21, 2008 - April 25, 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/links-for-the-week-of-april-21-2008-april-25-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/links-for-the-week-of-april-21-2008-april-25-2008/</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Original reporting. Cradle-to-grave law tracking. Since 2004.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: michael walsh</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/links-for-the-week-of-april-21-2008-april-25-2008/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>michael walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=417#comment-687</guid>
		<description>While I haven't check this, it strikes me as quite likely that the judges who are not following Cicairos are GOP-nominated judges who have a generally pro-business disposition, and they don't follow Cicairos for the sole reason that they don't have to. It's certainly not because they drew inferences from the California Supreme Court's denial of review in Cicairos that would lead them to believe that the Supreme Court would have gone the other way if it had decided the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I haven&#8217;t check this, it strikes me as quite likely that the judges who are not following Cicairos are GOP-nominated judges who have a generally pro-business disposition, and they don&#8217;t follow Cicairos for the sole reason that they don&#8217;t have to. It&#8217;s certainly not because they drew inferences from the California Supreme Court&#8217;s denial of review in Cicairos that would lead them to believe that the Supreme Court would have gone the other way if it had decided the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
