Ghazaryan v. Diva Limousine

by Jon-Erik G. Storm on Monday, January 12th, 2009

Three steps forward, two steps diagonal, three steps back.

Because the trial court incorrectly focused on the potential difficulty of assessing the validity of Diva’s compensation policy in light of variations in how drivers spend their gap time, we reverse the court’s denial of the motion and remand with directions to certify Ghazarya’s two proposed subclasses.

Wage/hour class action certifications are like the recipe for Coke. Complicated, and apparently inside information for the Court of Appeal.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

H. Scott Leviant 01.12.09 at 4:16 pm

Now that is funny. It’s not often that I run across a post that short which offers that much in the way of commentary.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>