<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Storm&#039;s Employment Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:02:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>MCLE By Me.</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/mcle-by-me/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/mcle-by-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re in the San Luis Obispo area or if you&#8217;re interested in something a little different for MCLE this time around, please come to this one:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/mcle-by-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brinker Oral Argument Liveblog</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/brinker-oral-argument-liveblog/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/brinker-oral-argument-liveblog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[9:27 : Not sure if going down the tip-pooling argument was a good move there. 9:30 : Don&#8217;t wait for the translation: YES OR NO! (; 9:35 : I guess Calchannel didn&#8217;t anticipate how popular this would be. Video is &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/brinker-oral-argument-liveblog/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/brinker-oral-argument-liveblog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smartphones In The Workplace</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/smartphones-in-the-workplace/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/smartphones-in-the-workplace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 00:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know the party-line. Smartphones in the workplace are bad. For all the same reasons we always hear why technology [insert name here] is bad. Workers are just looking at porn. Smartphones make people downright rude at work. But I &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/smartphones-in-the-workplace/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/smartphones-in-the-workplace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>III Brown, Year I Employment Law: UPDATE</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/iii-brown-year-i-employment-law-update/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/iii-brown-year-i-employment-law-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Weideman blogs so I don&#8217;t have to on the new laws this year. I would just add that this is far from what the doomsayers thought would come about. Again. Here&#8217;s some more  and even more from Greg at Shaw Valenza. Greg, you don&#8217;t &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/iii-brown-year-i-employment-law-update/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/iii-brown-year-i-employment-law-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Deputy Labor Commissioner Once Told Me…</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/a-deputy-labor-commissioner-once-told-me%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/a-deputy-labor-commissioner-once-told-me%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the San Jose Mercury News: The federal government said Wednesday it is suing a Panda Express restaurant in West San Jose for making its Latino workers clean toilets while Asian employees stood by and enjoyed an easier workload. Living &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/a-deputy-labor-commissioner-once-told-me%e2%80%a6/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/a-deputy-labor-commissioner-once-told-me%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NLRB Rule Changes = 10-20 day elections?</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/nlrb-rule-changes-10-20-day-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/nlrb-rule-changes-10-20-day-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 23:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conservative National Review Online thinks so. The liberal Mother Jones takes NRO at its word, but points out that while the batting average of unions in elections has gone up, the overall number of recognition votes has gone down, &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/nlrb-rule-changes-10-20-day-elections/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/nlrb-rule-changes-10-20-day-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart Case: Pyrrhic Victory for Employers</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/wal-mart-case-pyrrhic-victory-for-employers/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/wal-mart-case-pyrrhic-victory-for-employers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 23:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The effect of this case will be more, smaller employment lawsuits against larger businesses and will have no impact on cases against smaller employers. Best case for Wal-Mart: they just turned frontal combat into guerilla war. The Plaintiffs&#8217; bar big &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/wal-mart-case-pyrrhic-victory-for-employers/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/wal-mart-case-pyrrhic-victory-for-employers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arnold…</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/arnold%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/arnold%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[…you can&#8217;t do that. And maybe I&#8217;m getting a little out of date, but I don&#8217;t believe being &#8220;exempt&#8221; means you can get paid nothing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/arnold%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lewis v. Chicago</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/lewis-v-chicago/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/lewis-v-chicago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 20:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ricci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[title vii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Damned if you do, Ricci&#8216;d if you don&#8217;t—or if you try and correct the past mistake, that is. I&#8217;m sure none of the demagoguery about Ricci thought that this consequence could have been predicted. It was obvious. Most likely, the &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/lewis-v-chicago/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/lewis-v-chicago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Job Market Realignment</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/job-market-realignment/</link>
		<comments>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/job-market-realignment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 06:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon-Erik Storm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Categories]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today&#8217;s New York Times: Many of the jobs lost during the recession are not coming back. Period. For the last two years, the weak economy has provided an opportunity for employers to do what they would have done anyway: dismiss &#8230; <a href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/job-market-realignment/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/job-market-realignment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

