Courts to Employers: Stop Trying To Loophole 16600

by Jon-Erik G. Storm on Friday, November 20th, 2009

I apologize for the almost total lack of posting. I was in a trial that involved testimony over 4 weeks starting October 6, and just finished up the concluding briefs today. If you can believe it, in the middle of all of that I had stomach surgery which cured a debilitating case of heartburn and as an added bonus has caused me to lose 15 pounds already.

So, I thought I’d point to this post from Robin Weideman on Dowell v. Pacesetter, Inc., a case which is more or less unremarkable, except that it is part of a continuing trend from the Court of Appeals: quit trying to make exceptions to B&P 16600.

We saw this earlier this year in TRG v. Galante and FLIR Systems v. Parrish. I noticed that I was hoping in my FLIR post to see the TRG ruling in July, but it came down in August.