<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brinker Madness!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/brinker-madness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/brinker-madness/</link>
	<description>The First Blog Dedicated To California Employment Law. Original reporting. Cradle-to-grave law tracking. Since 2004.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:42:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kent</title>
		<link>http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/brinker-madness/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stormsemploymentlaw.com/?p=444#comment-949</guid>
		<description>i got a question today about the compensability of a meal break when the employee clocks back in at minute 27 or 29 rather than at the full 30.

before Brinker, the Labor Commissioner&#039;s manual included section 45.2.9, called &quot;Premium Is Imposed For Failure to Provide Meal Period In Accordance With Applicable IWC Orders.&quot; and, it included this statement: &quot;if the meal period was for less than thirty minutes, the premium [for a missed meal period] would apply.&quot;

after Brinker, the Labor Commissioner eliminated this section.

so what&#039;s the law? you can&#039;t deduct for any break when it&#039;s only 29 minutes long -- or can you? i can&#039;t point to the DLSE manual for that answer anymore.

still, the Labor Commissioner&#039;s opinion letter at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/opinions/1992-01-28.pdf says when an employee shortens a meal break and returns to work &quot;the whole of the meal period must be compensated.&quot;

i don&#039;t think the rule changed -- it&#039;s just the Labor Commissioner taking away the clarity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i got a question today about the compensability of a meal break when the employee clocks back in at minute 27 or 29 rather than at the full 30.</p>
<p>before Brinker, the Labor Commissioner&#8217;s manual included section 45.2.9, called &#8220;Premium Is Imposed For Failure to Provide Meal Period In Accordance With Applicable IWC Orders.&#8221; and, it included this statement: &#8220;if the meal period was for less than thirty minutes, the premium [for a missed meal period] would apply.&#8221;</p>
<p>after Brinker, the Labor Commissioner eliminated this section.</p>
<p>so what&#8217;s the law? you can&#8217;t deduct for any break when it&#8217;s only 29 minutes long &#8212; or can you? i can&#8217;t point to the DLSE manual for that answer anymore.</p>
<p>still, the Labor Commissioner&#8217;s opinion letter at <a href="http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/opinions/1992-01-28.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlse/opinions/1992-01-28.pdf</a> says when an employee shortens a meal break and returns to work &#8220;the whole of the meal period must be compensated.&#8221;</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t think the rule changed &#8212; it&#8217;s just the Labor Commissioner taking away the clarity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
